Sunday, 12 December 2010

Henry Campbell BANNERMAN Died 01-Dec-2010 - Crematorium 17th. - Condolences

Henry Campbell BANNERMAN Died 01-Dec-2010 - Crematorium 17th. - Condolences. 
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 
The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  
Henry Campbell BANNERMAN Died 01-Dec-2010 
Crematorium 17th. 10am. Tonbridge Wells

Henry Campbell BANNERMAN
Died aged 79
on the 1st. December 2010
leaving his wife Monica
sons: David & James
daughter: Nikki

The Funeral will take place on Friday 17th. December
at The Crematorium Tonbridge Wells.

My condolences to the family though I understand that his death will be something of a relief minded that donations are requested for Alzheimer Disease.

It is interesting to note that Henry Campbell BANNERMAN did not affect a hyphen in his name (as do I & from time to time does David)

It would seem that this particular Henry Campbell BANNERMAMN is NOT and nor could he possibly have been a decendant of the Glasgow born Prime Minister, son of Sir James Campbell of Stracathro, Sir Henry Campbell Bannerman took on the name Bannerman and added a hyphen  when he was 35 in 1871 as a condition of the inheritance of the substantial Estate of his Mother's brother Henry Bannerman; as his only traceable male heir, distant as their relationship may have been.

Sir Henry Campbell-Bannerman died two years after his wife and has the two fold distinction firstly as the first man to take the title Prime Minister and also the first man to die in office in number 10 Downing street, which he did on 22nd. April 1908 with no progent having been the first and the last Campell Bannerman.

That an unrelated or exceedingly distant wing of the Bannerman family chose to adopt the name Campbell is of no material consequence in either genetic or pecuniary heredity from Sir Henry Campbell-Bannerman.

It is noted that the now deceased father of David Bannerman of UKIP did not effect to hyphenate his name despite the commonality of name with the politician who died over 30 years before he was born.

For the record it is both legal and lawfull to alter ones' name should one so wish - it only becomes a crime should the action be taken, as with David Bannerman, to obtain pecuniary gain, to deliberately mislead or to defraud.

Having obtained his position as an MEP and as the then Chairman of UKIP by fraud and deception for personal gain let us hope that the odious little shill David Bannerman will at least be pricked by concience as he watches the coffin of the father whose lineage he foreswore for personal gain stand upon the cataphalc as the curtains in the crematorium close for his final dispatch.

There would seem no doubt that David Bannerman is a duplicitous, dishonest fraud and not fit to represent anyone even having colluded in the utterly corrupt rigging of the selection for MEPs CLICK HERE

Fake & Fraud, duplicitous and untrustworthy as David Bannerman may be let us hope he does not find it too great a fag keeping his end up with the family he may feel he has duped - for their sakes!

'The Forrest Gump of Fringe Politics'

- I rest my case on Charlie's words ;-)

sorry no better credit as it is a fake name! (A bit Like Bannerman's!) 


 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance
Reclaim YOUR Future 
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate) .
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01291 - 62 65 62
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, 18 October 2010

David BANNERMAN 'The Forest Gump of Fringe Politics' - I rest my case on Charlie's words ;-)


'The Forrest Gump of Fringe Politics'

- I rest my case on Charlie's words ;-)

sorry no better credit as it is a fake name! (A bit Like Bannerman's!)

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance
Reclaim YOUR Future 
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate) .
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01291 - 62 65 62
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, 16 October 2010

NEITHER Nigel FARAGE nor David BANNERMAN Offers UKIP An Honourable Future!

NEITHER Nigel FARAGE nor David BANNERMAN Offers UKIP An Honourable Future!
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable!
The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name! 
NEITHER Nigel FARAGE nor David BANNERMAN Offers UKIP An Honourable Future!
BOTH have a clear track record of corruption and dishonesty!



Put your questions to Tim and Gerard



as ever UKIP have proved they are UTTERLY without Morality, Completely Without Integrity and bereft of Principles.

The fake leadership placement of Pearson was only marginally less farcicle than his ineptitude in the job keeping Farage's seat warm. Farage had no choice but to go along with it as it seems Stuart Wheeler had refused to put anything into UKIP's General Election campaign if Farage was leader - we understand that having read this blog & Junius and dipped into the squabblings on Butcher's squalid little Forum he had come to the VERY convinced position that Farage was working for himself.

Butcher's Forum showed just how vile many of the parasites within UKIP were, with the taunting and lies of, smears and abuse of people like Douglas Denny, Mick McTrough, Independent UKIP, Croucher Skeptyk and others and just how many and accurate are the critics of UKIP.

Clearly the chicanery and corruption surrounding Farage & Bannerman is indisputable - whether directly by them or on their behalf by their corrupt 'placements'.

The Leadership hustings have been a total farce with Farage/Bannerman placemen like the oleaginous oik Peter Reeve 'orchestrating' the hustings and selecting the questions and who shall ask them - it could be argued that UKIP has, if nothing else, learned from The EU how to more competently abrogate on their duties and befoul the concepts of democracy.

The purpose of the hustings is for the members to question and cross examine the candidates NOT for a paid handler to bring on his performing monkey and supply it with exactly the peanuts it best performs on!

You will note that serial liars have much to hide and as The Times and other papers have shown us both Nigel Farage and David Bannerman are both liars, cheats and self serving - surrounded by their own corrupt placement. Now they perform their stunts as performers with little ability between them as we can see from the fact that jointly they have enriched themselves in the two leading positions in UKIP for many years - without honour, without integrity and without competence.

As a result UKIP obtained under 30 elected seats out of about 19,000 in Britain and by election to Westminster after 17 years ABSOLUTELY NO ONE within so much as shouting distance and with 3.1% only of the electorate who trusts The Farage Party and with no personalities, no gravitas and no apparent competence just one performing monkey being endlessly and immaturely rude to people in between childish stunts - just what part of society was expected to vote for such ghastly people.

With not a single solitary training session let alone program of training just look at the caliber of their staff, their PPCs even ignoring the criminality of their MEPs.

Clearly there are efforts to rig even the leadership election to hang onto control of the CASH - like the monkey with its fist stuck in the cookie jar for fear of letting go of the biscuit!

Tim Congdon with clearly NOTHING to hide is only too happy to be willing to hold an open session to answer member's Questions - I appreciate Gerard Batten has colluded in the corruption and abuse of members having NEVER spoken out and willingly endorsing the racism, anti Judaism, Xenophobic violence, pro EU policy, holocaust denial of his EFD group which it is expected will - when Farage is reinstated as leader of The MEPs on the 6th. even if he were NOT leader he is likely - TOTALLY against the wishes of the members of UKIP - to dump UKIP in favour of his Pan EU Political Party The EFD, which he chairs and which is ALREADY REGISTERED.

The only hope UKIP has is to wrest UKIP back from the corrupt and self serving scum that currently control it.

Even then it will be an uphill battle to re-establish UKIP as an entity of some probity that the more than 3.1% of the electorate are prepared to trust.

Tim Congdon's international reputation as a leading market economist, with his experience of Government over many years and with his independently successful track record may just manage to make UKIP electable - rid of the trash that has gathered around Farage's toilet seat on which he has enthroned himself!

To: undisclosed recipients:

Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 4:35 PM

Subject: E-mail to Tim Congdon's supporters in the 2010 UKIP leadership contest: announcement of 'Leadership Tele-Conference' on 18th October

E-mail sent to supporters of Tim Congdon’s bid for the leadership of the UK Independence Party, on 14th October 2010

This e-mail is sent to you because I have been informed - or have good reason to believe - that you are a supporter of my bid to become leader of UKIP. If you do not want to receive e-mails from me, perhaps you would let me know. The leadership campaign rules are intended to encourage discussion and debate, but also to prevent spamming.

Dear friends and supporters,

Here is the second e-mail announcement today. PLEASE CIRCULATE THIS MESSAGE TO ALL YOUR PERSONAL LISTS. Gerard, Steve and I want hard questions - and lots of them!

Announcement from Tim Congdon, Gerard Batten and Stephen Allison


We want to give as many members as possible the opportunity to discuss our plans for the UK Independence Party and to outline the policies we want to develop for the party. Some people have difficulty attending the hustings. We are therefore very pleased to announced that all members of UKIP are invited to put live questions to us from 7 pm to 8 pm on Monday, 18th October, on 0203 0032 666.

We look forward to hearing from you. The harder the questions, the better!

Put questions to Tim, Gerard and Steve LIVE on our UKIP Leadership Tele-Conference between 7.00pm to 8.00pm on Monday 18th October.

Dial 0203 0032 666 (local rate call) to put your questions and listen to the debate.

You are not only free to circulate this message more widely to other party members. You are positively requested to circulate it widely to as many party members as possible.

With best wishes

Tim Congdon
 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance
Reclaim YOUR Future 
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate)
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01291 - 62 65 62
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, 12 October 2010


Here is the list of support David Bannerman raised to split the opposition vote for Nigel Farage in the leadership rip off of 2006, when due to his cupidity David Bannerman almost blew it.

It was David Bannerman's job to split the vote likely to accrue to Richard Suchorzewski & David Noakes -= two genuine candidates for leadership. Bannerman however due to his ineptitude was suckered by Richard Suckorzewski at the Derby meeting into showing off by correcting Richard Suckorzewski when to plan he claimed that Ashford's contribution to Party Funds was less than 10% of its income.

Bannerman could not resist the opportunity of correcting Suckorzewski as we had expected and leapt to his feet as Chairman  to show he knew more and proudly announced that the amount that was received was nearer 15%. So there we have it over 85% of the money raised at Ashford - described by Farage as UKIP's most successfull venture ever reached the party according to The Party Chairman at the time!

Whose pocket did the rest of the money end up in?

Despite this foot in mouth by the utterly inept David Bannerman he was still rewarded by Farage for his efforts and made Deputy Leader!

Here is the list for 2006 do compare it with 2010!

Gerard Batten, MEP (UKIP, London),

Hugh Williams (Devon south-west),

Bill Budge (North Cornwall),
Mary Budge (North Cornwall), Heather White (North Cornwall),
Peter Douglas Mullery (North Cornwall),
Rupert Powell (North Cornwall),
Michael James Carter (Falmouth & Camborne),
Elizabeth Winkfield (Torridge & West Devon branch - Poll Tax Martyr),
David Johnson (Torridge & West Devon),
Rollo Reid (Christchurch),
Rear Admiral Richard Heaslip – South West – Christchurch, Mike Eckel (Christchurch),
Lorna Jean Heaslip (Christchurch),
George Tarker Stride (Bognor Regis & Littlehampton),
Sheilagh Rose (Bognor Regis & Littlehampton),
Kenneth M. Wells (Bognor Regis & Littlehampton),
David John Davies (Bognor Regis & Littlehampton),
Michael Pirkis (Arundel & South Downs),
Dorothy Pirkis (Arundel & South Downs),
Lynnda Robson (Croydon, Regional Organiser London),
Peter Morgan (Croydon branch),
John Tyndall (Croydon branch),
John Bailey (Croydon branch),
Stuart Gulleford (Brentwood & Ongar),
Margaret Thorpe (Brentwood & Ongar),
Derek William Camp (Brentwood & Ongar),
Yvonne Maguire (Brentwood & Ongar),
J. C. Pryce (Halan & East Chelmsfield branch),
Nikki Sinclaire (Sutton Coldfield - Regional Organiser West Midlands),
Mark Natrass (Sutton Coldfield),
Derek Bennett (Walsall & Wolverhampton),
Bimla Ban (Birmingham),
Rachel Jane Oxley (Liverpool Branch),
Lisa Duffy (North Manchester & Salford - Chairman NW County Committee),
Peter Reeve (North Manchester & Salford),
Ronald Beaman (North Manchester & Salford),
Philip Smith (Wigan), Catherine Andrea Ritchie (North Manchester & Salford),
Hilary Jane Jones (Birkenhead, Wallasey & Wirral - Former Conservative Mayor of Wirral),
Henry Frederick Crocker (Birkenhead, Wallasey & Wirral),
Michael Walter Sydney Pepler (Birkenhead, Wallasey & Wirral),
Lynda Williams (Birkenhead, Wallasey & Wirral),
Paul Nuttal (Bootle),
Pat Gaskell (Bootle),
Joseph Nugent (Bootle Branch),
Andrew Dobson (Bootle Branch),
Cyril Wakefield (Boston & Skegness),
Audrey Wakefield (Boston & Skegness),
Peter Thomas Neilson (Scotland - Chairman, Scotland),
Helen Margaret Hay (Scotland),
Charles M. Stewart (Scotland).
Supporters: Delroy Young (East Midlands and NEC member),
Lady Shirley Moran (Wales),
Paul Tate (Swansea),
Bruce Robertson (Trago Mills),
Barry Grundon (North Cornwall),
Jane Rosemary Toplis (North Cornwall),
Alwyn Riley (North Cornwall),
Marcus John Taylor (St. Helens),
Simon Andrew Hairswape (St. Helens),
Norman Dawson (St. Helens),
Mrs N. Dawson (St. Helens),
Jacqueline Francis (Christchurch, Dorset,
Pearl A. Wells (Bognor Regis & Littlehampton),
Teresa W. H. Davies (Bognor Regis & Littlehampton),
Carole Gregory (Croydon),
James Felsemberger (Croydon),
Susan Camp (Brentwood and Ongar),
Janette Gulleford (Brentwood & Ongar),
Lyn Afshar (Sutton Coldfield),
Margaret Beaman (North Manchester),
William Michael Magee (Birkenhead, Wallasey & Wirral),
Euphemia Ann Crocker (Birkenhead, Wallasey & Wirral),
Philip Griffiths (Birkenhead, Wallasey & Wirral),
May Barton (Bootle),
Philip Wordley (Bootle),
Stephen John Withers (Scotland),
Nicholas Watson (Scotland),
Robert Willescroft

Most notable supporters of Bannerman could get within the party last time back in 2006 include Delroy Young, Lisa Duffy & Peter Reeve, Paul Nuttal and Nikki Sinclaire.

The only one, probably to his embarrassment, who has stuck with him is Peter Reeve it seems & of course Hugh Williams who is clearly self seeking and to be trusted as far as he can be kicked being a proven cheat and liar who so betrayed his own branch they threw him out!

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance
Reclaim YOUR Future 
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate) .
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01291 - 62 65 62
Enhanced by Zemanta

David BANNERMAN's Proposer and Assentors UKIP Leadership Election 2010 - WHO?

Patrick MooreImage via WikipediaDavid BANNERMAN's Proposer and Assentors UKIP Leadership Election 2010 - WHO?

Sir Patrick MOORE

Donald Martin

Prof. Stephen Bush

and WHO?

Well for heavens sake of the rest the only ones one has ever heard of seem best known as liars and cheats like Hugh Williams and Douglas Denny surely the kiss of death to any REAL campaign but I overlook the aim of this pro EU EFD member is not to win but to split the vote to ensure Farage gets his coronation.

The same sordid stunt David Bannerman pulled last time!

David Bannerman is so despised by his colleagues that he couldn't even get the backing of a single MEP - they know what a hopeless inadequate he is.

He couldn't even get his criminal collaborator Stuart Agnew to endorse him even though they were engaged in fraud together as shown by The Sunday Times and currently under investigation by the authorities.

David Campbell Bannerman
Sir Patrick Moore.

Cllr Peter Reeve
Cllr Henry Reilly
Cllr Mick Harold
Douglas Denny
Hugh Williams
Mark Wadsworth
Harry Aldridge
Shirley Jacobs
Nathan Gill
David Coburn
James Moyies
James Carver
Terry Durrance
Michael McManus
Sue Ransome
Peter Neilson
John Cornforth
Jason Smith
Donald Martin
Leon Stedman
Prof Stephen Bush
Gaston Dezart
Rev John Ewington
Bill Budge
Mary Budge
Andrea Hamilton
David Hamilton
Carol Lovatt
Maria Foy
Tim Aker
Stephen Scott Fawcett
Dr John Howlitt
Philip Anderson
Christine Anderson
Colin Curtis
Jonathan Frost
Jennifer Powell
Glen Bishop
Josephine Bishop
Barry Grundon
John Pitts
Sue Stow
Christine Wardrop
Linda Redford
Stuart Letten
Ray Crowson
John Culverwell
Bill Fenoughty
Iain Richmond
Iris Pitts
 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance
Reclaim YOUR Future 
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate) .
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01291 - 62 65 62
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, 1 October 2010

David BANNERMAN - We're Working On The Details & Seeking The Personality!

He's Got A Desk

Loads More To Come

Seeking The Truth!

He'll Spill My Coffee
Delivering Data
Like That!

Monday, 27 September 2010

Bannerman's - LEADERSHIP ADDRESS - 27-Sep-2010

Dear Colleagues,
The Choice at this Leadership Election is one between seizing our wonderful opportunities, moving
forward professionally, becoming a fully =ledged political party with a full set of policies and
succeeding in our objective of leaving the EU OR slipping backwards into our single issue comfort
zone and old ways - and failing.
What the party earnestly needs now is stable Leadership – a safe pair of hands. The media are already
mocking us for having 4 Leaders in one year (Farage/Pearson/Interim/New).We cannot afford another
resignation within a year owing to personal considerations or a lack of understanding of party politics.
Our party will become a joke. The next Leadermust be up to the task of a full, 4 year term.
I stand on the basis of professionalising the party and introducing a new style of meritocratic,
team leadership. This means bringing in professional skills and using the amazing talent base we
have in this party, as I did with the policy groups ( it doesn’t mean hiring a load of fully paid
professionals to bankrupt us ). It means working as one team, not a one man band. It means
believing in policies, bothering to read the manifesto and growing UKIP into a party that =ights
all elections, with proper training and support for you as candidates. I support a full ‘shadow
cabinet’ of policy spokesmen too (see below).
I have huge respect for Nigel: his oratory, courage, media performances and good company. I would
ask Nigel to remain as the ‘face of the party’, and as Leader in Europe, whilst I lead as Party Leader.
We would retain Nigel’s strengths, whilst using my strengths as a strategist, policy expert and
To do this, I will pull back from my commitments in Brussels and concentrate fully on the UK. I
pledge to spend on average three quarters of my time in the UK. My team will also be UK based.
What I believe I can offer you is the right Vision, Experience and Team to deliver this:
I want to have 20 elected UKIP MPs under AV+ (the Alternative Vote Plus voting system) - I am
already undertaking a lobbying campaign to help deliver this aim. 30 elected UKIP Peers too under
new plans for an elected House of Lords (10% of 300 seats) and being the largest UK party in the
European Parliament next time (2014). This needs planning and resources now, and use of the
substantial contacts I have in politics.
• I want to lay out a Positive Vision of a free, independent Britain, using an apolitical approach
and bringing in key Higures including top politicians, experts, academics and journalists. This I
would lead from the front, in cooperation with similar groups.
• I want to make the party more democratic and listen to the membership, not override their
wishes. I oppose rushing into a new pan-European Party before we have a chance to
understand its implications – we must properly consult with you members Hirst. I believe it could
be a step too far.
Party Chairman 2005-06 / Deputy Leader 2006 to date
• Head of Policy 2006 to date: Put together all the 17 policy groups, oversaw all policy papers,
and wrote the 2010 manifesto and mini manifesto, and other manifestos for the party since 2005
• Government experience at the highest and most serious levels – as Special Adviser on the
Northern Ireland Peace Process, one of the most important initiatives in decades
• Media – high proHile interviews with Jeremy Paxman (Newsnight), John Humphrys (Today), BBC
News, Politics Show, Radio 5 Live, Sky News, On The Record, National Press, and local TV/radio
continued over
teamdcb_letter 27/9/10 15:51 Page 1
• Campaigning – a record of continuous campaigning - 4 General Elections (50% increase in South
Suffolk 2010 to 7%: 2,454 votes in 2001), By-elections (I was responsible for the messaging and
strategy for UKIP’s most successful by-election – 11.8% in Norwich North ), European Elections
(won in 2010), local elections, the AV+ campaign now. High proHile Public Relations and
communications campaigns for top companies
• Political ofHices – Councillor, TunbridgeWells. Bow Group Chairman (100 MPs, 7 in Cabinet)
I will be progressively announcing the details ofmy teamshortly onmy website, but here is the
teamstructure I am working to and the roles I envisage. I believe in using the full talent base of
the party and will not just use those who support me as assentors:
• Party Leader and Head of Policy: I intend to oversee a ‘Shadow Cabinet’ of 16 policy and media
Spokesmen, who should have proper media and research backup. They will cover Foreign
Affairs & International Trade, Tax/Budgetary Affairs, Jobs, Enterprise & the Economy, Immigration,
Law & Order, Education, Healthcare, Defence, Energy & the Environment, Pensions.Welfare into
Workfare, Constitution/HowWe’re Governed, Restoring Britishness, Housing & Planning, Food,
Farming & the Countryside, and Fishing.
• Party Chairman – with a history of service to the Party and great and proven knowledge of
• Deputy Leader – a professional who is a loyal, hard working and efHicient deputy
• I will create a number of Deputy Chairmen where a title is needed to match the task
• A new Head of Fundraising – someone who has an appropriate fundraising record for issues-based
organisations such as charities, universities and think tanks, who is paid through commission to
save the party overheads. They would complement Lord Pearson’s work
• A new Director of a Patrons Club – to help raise party funds through events for Patrons
• A new Hedge Funds and Funding Adviser – an expert on Hedge Fund contacts and funders
• A new Head of City Issues – a former City professional with extensive contacts in London markets
• A new Head of Membership Marketing – someone with a proven record of building membership
numbers in leading membership organisations (eg AA, National Trust)
• A new liaison ofHicer of Expatriate Communities – to build membership and links with ex pats
• A new Head of Research – a bright research professional with extensive experience of politics and
think tanks
• A new Head of Training – to develop training packages for members
• A new Head of Social Policy – to concentrate on a wide spread of social issues of appeal to the
working man and woman
• Party Secretary: willing to undertake legal work on an modest honorarium basis
• I fully support existing roles such as Party Director, General Secretary and Treasurer.
I therefore ask you to back a New UKIP – more professional, more focused,more successful –
and not to go back to an old UKIP, which has served us well but which will not take us higher. I will
always put my country Hirst, and we need to raise our game to save this country. I ask for your support
as Leader.
Best wishes,
PSWe have to professionalise our party to get out the EU. Please see my campaign website:
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, 4 April 2010




Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!


"We did it in the European elections. 
We passed on £80,00 from one person in effect...
and that caused no difficulty at all," Lord Pearson


You will be aware that Nigel Farage endlessly willing to lie on the media to the public, makes much of the claim that when HE found out that Ashley Mote and Tom Wise had fallen foul of the law UKIP, unlike other parties acted ruthlessly and decisively.

Minded of Farage's status:
can we assume that Farage will act in an honourable manner and on Monday morning withdraw the so called whip from Stuart Agnew who has openly admitted on tape that wittingly he has been illegally obtaining tax payer's money by deceipt to fund Peter Reeve - he CLEARLY confirmed this as illegal.

Having had the fact that David Bannerman is similarly involved in this fraud and deception which is known to be illegal:

Will Stuart Agnew & David Bannerman both be suspended as UKIP MEPs and party procedure be followed for a full disciplinary hearing?

That Peter Reeve was also involved in this criminal activity will Farage on Monday morning fire him also?

Let us see what value Farage's lies on TV are worth in dealing with the criminal money laundering carried out and the further conspiracy to criminally launder money on the part of Lord Pearson will he too be suspended pending the inevitable criminal proceedings.

That of course leaves Nigel Farage in the position where the only honourable action as not only did this all occur on his watch as leader but also clearly he was party to the crimes as committed - One assumes he will, as effective leader, have the integrity to resign pending such criminal proceedings as now seem inevitable.

Do be minded that Nigel Farage has no alternative but to suspend each man involved and resign for you will recall that he states very clearly in his little book that he said if Tom Wise was not voted out by the NEC he himself would resign and as he also proudly boasts he was standing as a witness for the prosecution in the Crown Case against Tom Wise and Lindsay Jenkins.

Nigel Farage, with his dishonesty and braggadocio, has rather painted his way into a corner - either he must resign his seat as an MEP or carry on utterly discredited in shame to preside over the party he destroyed.

Do remind me but how did the idiot Nattrass get on when with all that bluster he threatened to sue The Sunday Times for telling the truth! Interestingly although he openly states he isn't racist and is unhappy about membership of the racist, xenophobic Pan EU Political Party EFD grouping he is too shamelessly gutless to leave The EFD - even though he and Batten, Coleman & Buffton all mutter about leaving AFTER the General Election they are perfectly happy to lie to the electorate in the mean time it seems - they lack the moral fibre to stand on their own feet and are frightened of not having Farage to wipe their noses for them it seems!

With two MEPs jailed for fraud and a number of MEPs it would seem still under a cloud with OLAF who have passed the files on within the EU pending passing them to British Police they are 'still at it'.

Then we have Derek Clarke who stood up in a public meeting and openly boasted of how he defrauded the tax payers through his EU expenses and allowances - not to mention paying his Regional Organiser £800 a week despite the fact he lost his driving license as a drunk!

We now have it on the record that Peter Reeve does virtually no work for the tax payers who pay his salary laundered through the liar and cheat David Bannerman and the bullying NFU MEP Agnew who openly states he has paid enough money to buy his MEPship!

Is it any wonder that UKIP are considered little more than a ship of fools when having guaranteed a Tory donor anonimity they glibbly bandy round the name of Partick Barbour as involved with UKIP and Lord Pearson in a criminal conspiracy to defraud!

Every word of Claire Newell's film is a part of a criminal conspiracy with intent to defraud!

Tom Wise was sentenced to 2 years in prison for his criminal money laundering which amounted to about £30K with a seeming intent to continue for a further 4 years.

Here we are talking of:
The titular leader Lord Pearson
The real leader Nigel Farage MEP
The deputy leader David Bannerman MEP
Stuart Agnew MEP
Patrick Barbour
Peter Reeve

ALL to a greater or lesser extent involved in actual criminal fraudulent money laundering, criminally obtaining money by deception, conspiracy to criminally obtain money by deception, or so it would seem based on the facts as presented in The Sunday Times.

I had always warned that UKIP were being incredibly stupid in the likes of Douglas Denny, Mark Croucher, Michael McGough and other low lifes in UKIP either in their own names or fake names endlessly insulting the media and the journalists and the biggest single loss Farage would seem to have made was in his foolish weenie waggling competition with the Sunday Times when they paid him to go away - just look at the publicity he has had from the Times Group since - even his naff book got totally panned! & UKIP's spring Conference and General Election launch gained ZERO publicity beyond Farage's scrotum which is as depleted as UKIP's morality, principles, competence, integrity, vision or ability.

Is it any wonder EUkip's only backer of serious substance Stuart Wheeler finally walked away two weeks ago in some disgust - he was it seems unwilling to go on pouring his hard earned money into an unaccounted structure where many believe Farage and others have trousered £Millions; where Nattrass memorably stated:
'we can't let Tom (Wise) get done , we are all at it for F***'* sake, how do you think we fund things'

We understand the last straw for Stuart Wheeler was the endless squabbling and back stabbing within the leadership cabal and finally the utterly dishonourable behaviour towards Nikki Sinclaire in breech of even EUkip's jaded rules! But then again the rules do not apply to EUkip's own in house spiv Nigel Farage!

Read the article below and YOU decide if it was wise of EUkip to keep insulting the media in general and Daniel Foggo, myself and Junius in particular!

You may well remember Agnew even threatened to beat me up on a couple of eMails and Croucher acting seemingly as an agent for UKIP saw fit to abuse the Court process to try to bankrupt me to silence the truth, Douglas Denny endlessly lies about me and makes a fool of himself insulting Daniel Foggo, Michael McGough tries desparately to link Foggo with MI5 - I wonder in the light f facts whether they still consider such actions are wise!

This at a time when due to the unbridled dishonesty and corruption of Andrew Smith, Nigel Farage, David Lott and others they earned a Guilty verdict in the Courts that left them with an unsecured debt of £3/4 million - such that they seemingly could not pay and so rather than go bankrupt it seems they yet again appealed the clear verdict which will escalate the debt to aroind £1.2Million when they are re-established as guilty as there is absolutely no doubt they are in breech of both the letter and the spirit of the law!

On would have thought even the most stupid of individuals would, with such a problem hanging over them, TRY to keep within the frame work of the law.

There’s more than one way to hide a donor

DESPITE having one of its former MEPs jailed for expenses fraud last year, the UK Independence party has benefited from the current distrust of the larger parties and is fielding its candidates in the general election on an anti-sleaze platform.
Yet its commitment to upholding political standards has now been revealed as less than perfect.

Stuart Agnew, a UKIP MEP, and Lord Pearson of Rannoch, the party’s leader, have told undercover reporters how a real donor's name could be kept secret by passing tens of thousands of pounds through intermediaries. If carried out, one or more of the suggested methods could have been illegal.

Our disclosures will embarrass UKIP and Pearson, who also told the undercover reporter that some UKIP members were “neanderthals” and described Agnew, 60, as “one of our only really sane MEPs”.

An undercover reporter approached Agnew last month, saying that her aunt wanted to make a substantial donation to UKIP while keeping her identity secret. This was, the reporter explained, because her aunt was a senior civil servant who would find it professionally embarrassing to have her name publicly linked with the party.

Agnew, who joined UKIP 11 years ago and was elected to the European parliament in 2009, was initially circumspect. Asked if the real donor’s name would have to be revealed publicly, he said: “I’m afraid if it’s significant it would have to be.” But within minutes he appeared to contradict himself.

“If she can trust you she could give you a huge sum of money and you could give it to the party,” he said.

“I will try and look into all these things though to see what can be done so there are a few options,” he added.

A few days later, Agnew rang to say that after taking advice from “experts” he had “encouraging information” and suggested a meeting.

Last Thursday he met the undercover reporter at a hotel in Colchester, Essex. Agnew began by outlining the law on giving anonymous donations. Any donation of more than £7,500 to a party headquarters, or £1,500 to a party individual or branch, must be declared to the Electoral Commission and the donor’s name given.

Although Agnew did not mention it, if a donation of more than £7,500 is made via a third party or agent, the details of the real donor must also be given to the political party so that they can be supplied to the commission, which then publishes them on its website. Making anonymous large donations by proxy is not allowed.

After summarising for the reporter the level permitted for anonymous donations, Agnew said: “Now this is where it gets a bit more complicated. She [the aunt] can give money to what’s known as an unincorporated association.”

Unincorporated associations, which do not have to file accounts, are allowed to make donations to political parties. There have long been suspicions, however, that they can be used as “filters” to pass money from donors who want to remain anonymous.

New rules state that donations totalling more than £25,000 a year from an unincorporated association will result in further scrutiny from the commission. It then demands a full list of everyone who has given to the association over the course of the previous year.

Even for donations of less than £25,000, however, the association is still required to disclose the true name of any donor who is using it as a proxy to give money.

Agnew suggested using Global Britain, which was set up in 1997 by Pearson and two other peers and now also includes fellow UKIP peer Lord Willoughby de Broke. It describes itself on its website as a “geo-political think tank” which conducts Eurosceptic research. Last May it donated £80,000 to UKIP in the run-up to the Euro elections.

Agnew said: “I’ve spoken to Nigel Farage [the UKIP MEP and former leader] and he says at the moment you can put £25,000 into Global Britain and you will remain anonymous.”

He went on: “Of course, there is an element of trust though that your aunt wants that money into UKIP. Now, as the thing is run by Malcolm Pearson and as he is the leader of UKIP, there’s a pretty good chance, isn’t there, that that money will go in the right direction.” Agnew later rang Farage in front of the reporter to recheck the possibility of giving the amount to UKIP via Global Britain.

Agnew continued to run down his list of ways of giving anonymously. He said: “Another thing she [the aunt] could do: you are her niece — she could give you £3,000 before April 5, in other words before the end of the tax year ... as a present, as a gift. You would then immediately give UKIP a donation of £3,000.” Agnew said she could then do the same next week — now in a new financial year — and in both cases avoid any tax penalties.

Adding all those methods together would allow the “aunt” to donate £38,500 anonymously, he said.

Then he raised the stakes even higher. “Your mother [sic] can make you a loan of £100,000 to buy a house ... and you would then become a donor to the party for £100,000 and your name would go up on the [commission] website.” Agnew said when the real donor died, she could state in her will that the loan was now a gift, thus writing it off. “You are seen to be the donor rather than her,” he said.

He added: “A loan can be for any amount if you are looking at a way of getting a substantial sum of money in your name. But remember, your name would then go on the website. And it would take quite an investigative journalist to try and work out [who you are].

“Nobody knows your particular status, you could have inherited money.” During the meeting Agnew also admitted that he was using taxpayers’ money to pay half the salary of an assistant — UKIP regional organiser Peter Reeve — whose amount of actual work for him was “virtually none”.

“I can tell you that Peter is paid partly by me out of my assistance allowance here partly by David [Campbell] Bannerman [another UKIP MEP]. He does very little work for us, virtually none. He is working for the party. And that’s strictly illegal.”
Salaries paid via MEPs’ assistance allowance must not fund party work. The EU’s anti-fraud watchdog Olaf has been investigating some of Agnew’s fellow MEPs over a similar matter.

The day after the meeting, Agnew spoke on the phone to the reporter a number of times. He said he had talked to Pearson about the possibility of making the donation to UKIP via Global Britain.

“He did confirm that two anonymous donations can be made. Up to £7,500 can be made directly to the party and £25,000 to Global Britain,” he said, describing the latter method as a “loophole”. “If your aunt is willing to give us £32,500 [£25,000 plus £7,500] then it can be done anonymously.”

Another undercover reporter then spoke to Pearson, who said the money given to his unincorporated association would be passed “straight on” to UKIP: “I could pass it on the same day.”

He insisted: “The Electoral Commission knows that we will be doing all this, because someone else who is a major Conservative donor also wanted similar anonymity. The main thing is that it mustn’t be a straight filter.”

Asked if he could guarantee her name would not come out, he said: “Yes, we did it in the European elections [in 2009]. We passed on £80,000 from one person in effect ... and that caused no difficulty at all.” He said he would check with the Electoral Commission and “if there was any doubt I would honestly rather go without rather than risk it”.

When confronted, Pearson said he thought unincorporated associations were allowed to pass on donations of not more than £25,000 directly. He also said he would have given the donor’s name to the commission, although he said he was “not sure” if he had passed on the name of Patrick Barbour, a former Tory donor who he said was the person who donated £80,000 to UKIP through them last year. He claimed Barbour had given Global Britain £100,000 saying he would be “happy” if most of it went to UKIP.

He explained why he thought Barbour had wanted to stay anonymous: “He’d rather the Conservative party didn’t know he was giving that sort of money, you know,” he said.

He said: “It still is my understanding that I do not think that what I said yesterday to your [undercover] reporter is wrong. I’m sorry if it is, and I’ll apologise.” Pearson said he was regularly in touch with the commission over Global Britain and donations.
Agnew said: “It’s not cut and dried and the acts are complicated. The law is often very difficult to interpret.”

Bannerman denied Reeve did no work for him and Agnew. He said Reeve worked for UKIP only “in his spare time”. Reeve agreed.

Farage said: “I said to Stuart Agnew, I can’t take this any further, that she [the aunt] would have to come and meet face to face with Lord Pearson and talk about it.”

Barbour said of his donation last year: “I am pretty sure that I left it up to [Pearson’s] discretion what it was spent on.”
In a later call he said he had not given to Global Britain in order to conceal an anonymous donation to UKIP.

A spokesman for the commission said it would take “appropriate action” if breaches of the rules had occurred.

To view the original article CLICK HERE

These are the people who if ever elected would be responsible NOT TO the Law but FOR the Law - clearly on every count they are unfit for purpose.


What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples - they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.

NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU's CAP - In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we thus leave our children and the future, with shame!

Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62


I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country.

Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.


Reclaim YOUR Future

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate

to Reclaim YOUR Future
Enhanced by Zemanta