Thursday, 16 June 2011

16-Jun-2011 - David BANNERMAN MEP Political Prostitute IS A FRAUD

16-Jun-2011 - David BANNERMAN MEP Political Prostitute IS A FRAUD

 Please Be Sure To
My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&
To Leave-The-EU

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

David Bannerman: Still a liar
Hi,

it is now 7 or 8 years since I wrote and warned in public that David Bannerman was a fraud, a charlatan, a liar and a cheat - and of course he was also, like most of the Party a failed Tory.

At that time he was betraying The Tories and clearly telling lies to ingratiate himself with the gullible fools that lead and have led UKIP for so long.

I warned that when this ghastly little ingrate had exploited UKIP to get himself the first serious paying job his CV would seem to indicate he had EVER had and held - then he would again betray his benefactors and would decamp to his next personal stepping stone in another cloud of lies - UKIP as ever were too stupid and too lacking in leadership to act responsibly and sadly I have been left with the rather bitter taste of 'I told you so'.

We note that David Bannerman persists in telling his new Tory chums that his great uncle was Sir Henry Campbell-Bannerman, the former liberal prime minister. He never gives up promoting that particular lie. He even told the BBC about this bogus claim at the time of his defection! LINK
Here are some of the facts:

Sir Henry Campbell-Bannerman had no children. Bannerman is not his great, great nephew.

In any meaningful sence David Bannerman is absolutely no relation of Sir Robert Campbell Bannerna - he is just a fraud who has lied for his own gain.

Interestingly it is perfectly legal to use whatever name YOU choose under British law and to insert or remove hyphens or call yourself Michael, mick, Mike or Charlie whatever your birth certificate may say.



I have had passports, that all link quite legally Master G.L. Watkins (Gregory Lance Watkins), with a plethora of Watkins at school rather than be Watkins minimus, Watkins minor or Watkins Major I effected a hyphen and conjoined a family prename becoming Greg Lance-Watkins (only people who don't know me have ever called me Gregory since I was about 6, quite handy as it differentiates immediately between those who know me and those who know little or nothing about me!).

My next passport was Mr. G. Lance-Watkins on the outside and Mr. Gregory Lance-Watkins inside.

My present passport of a few weeks ago is Gregory Lance Watkins - though correctly known as Greg Lance-Watkins on all other Government documents (my choice).

I make this point rather tediously to show that there is no problem legally in using other names - where David Bannerman falls foul of the law is he uses false names as aliases with the intent to lie, cheat, defraud and mislead as evidenced - This would seem to fit well with the political standards of both The Tories and UKIP - not for a moment to attribute one wit of integrity to any political party as they seem to have absolutely none!

It is clearly a criminal offence to make such changes of name with the intent to defraud or mislead, as has David Bannerman.

On Bannerman’s Bombay birth certificate his first names are David Campbell and his surname is Bannerman. He used to be known as David Bannerman. When he stood in Scotland (1997) it suddenly became David Campbell-Bannerman (with a hyphen). See: LINK
When he stood in 2001 for the Tories in Warrington and Leamington he reverted to David Bannerman

BBC NEWS VOTE 2001 RESULTS & CONSTITUENCIES Warwick & Leamington
The fable about being the great, great nephew of the dead prime minister wasn't used again until he joined UKIP.

Independence, Issue 63, Dec. 2005

A New Chairman

As some of you may have heard, UKIP has a new party chairman who will take office in January. David Campbell-Bannerman, a great nephew of former Liberal Prime Minister Henry Campbell-Bannerman. David is a senior PR consultant who is looking forward to taking up this new challenge. David contested North Cornwall for UKIP at the general election earlier this year. The January issue of Independence will feature more on David, but for now I am sure you will join me in wishing him all the best.

David Bannerman's CV when checked would seem to indicate absolutely no track record as a 'Senior PR', the closest would seem to be when a large company had effectively gone bust he seems to have jumped into a short term job as the senior management disassociated themselves from the debacle and dumped their jobs on the gullible greedy and unemployable to preserve their own names.

The dishonest ingrate David Bannerman, whose ONLY possibly true claim to any relationship with Sir Robert or his office was that David' claimed Father, who died just before Christmas owned a desk claimed to belong to Sir Henry. May I stress that although I own a letter from Lord Palmerston, had the sale manifesto of a cargo of slaves bought from a black trader in Sierra Leone and sold on the block in St. Helena, own the sword of surrender of the Nazi commander of The Luftwaffe in Poland, an original Piccasso, hold the original cheque from Fenemore-Cooper to pay for publication of one of his books as mentioned in his diary and a few other interesting items I am in no way related to any of these people!

David Bannerman has deliberately lied to defraud and mislead which is a criminal act. He also  has said:

"I have explained on numerous occasions that C-B had no children, but that my link to him is through the Bannerman side"and also

"Technically the link is actually great great great nephew".
If the first of these statements is true, the second must be untrue. The Liberal Prime Minister Sir Henry Campbell-Bannerman was born Henry Campbell. His mother was a Janet Bannerman, whose relation left Sir Henry a fortune on condition that he adopted the Bannerman name. Therefore if David Bannerman's link to Sir Henry is through the Bannerman side, he cannot be Sir Henry's nephew or any other kind of descendant. The closeset he can be is a Bannerman first cousin many generations removed.

Even that is in doubt when you consider the possible reason for the uncle foisting his name on his relation Janet's husband, Henry Campbell, the apparent reason being that he had no male heir of his own to carry on the Bannerman family name.

It would seem that there is a possibility of blood relationship with Janet Bannerman from a distant branch of her ancestors which were unrelated since the early 1800s or even the late 1700s. It would seem that the only possible heir to this side directly descended was a brother or nephew who the patriarch of that line was unwilling to bequeath his estates to as he was I gather a hopeless hapless drunk.

Mr. Bannerman left his estates to Sir Henry Campbell on condition that he adopted his wife's maiden name for usage - a style I gather his wife never adopted.

That would make David Bannerman's relationship to Sir Henry (if one exists at all) even more distant, at closest a Bannerman second cousin several times removed.

Regarding Bannerman, the above suggests that his surname is really Bannerman and that Campbell is a given prename name which he now uses as if it were part of his surname. Whilst this does not rule out a very distant relationship to Sir Henry Campbell-Bannerman, it doesn't prove one either.The delays in register of young David Campbell's birth in The India Book could equally well indicate his illegitimacy as the possible son of a servant girl adopted by an infertile mother or vica versa.



~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 
 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance
&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate) .
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01291 - 62 65 62

 Please Be Sure To
My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&
To Leave-The-EU

Wednesday, 1 June 2011

01-Jun-2011 - But David BANNERMAN Betrayed The Tories!

Turncoat & Traitor David BANNERMAN MEP SLAMS TORIES - 
Currently IN The Respected C.I.B. magazine for May & June 2011!!
.
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

01-Jun-2011 - But David BANNERMAN Betrayed The Tories!

Hi,

how right the odious and Oh so dishonest little liar and cheat David Bannerman MEP is.

The only words in this article that ring true are when he said 'You couldn't make it up' - David Bannerman after a series of spectacular failures standing under several different names failed to get elected to anything of any significance in mainstream politics.

Thus 7 years ago he re-invented himself with a new CV, new ancestry and new personna to seek self enrichment by exploiting the gullibility of UKIP and its star struck defacto leader Nigel Farage.

David Bannerman lied through his teeth when he betrayed The Tories 7 years ago - a fact which I pointed out in detail at the time and warned he would merely use and abuse UKIP for his personal gain and then jump ship when it suited him betraying the hard work of UKIP members - whether principles entered any side of this equation was a moot point!

Interestingly this all rather brings to light the underhand and untrustworthy behaviour of UKIP NEC Member Mick McGough who is loudly proclaiming yhis disloyalty to David Bannerman and that he knew he was 'A wrong un' and that he knew he was dishonest and couldn't be trusted. Mick McGough even announces on a Tory blog that David Bannerman was on the fiddle with his staff and public money in couched terms.

It seems reasonable to me to ask what use this revolting old man is to UKIP in view of his vile public behaviour, his lies and cheating and now his admission he knew all this all along but did not speak out on behalf of UKIP - he would it seems rather make a complete ass of himself with his childish and tasteless attacks on me and public gloating when he heard my cancer had - as long expected - returned.

Is it not the duty of a member of UKIP NEC to protect UKIP from betrayal? Yet we note Mick McGough and his long term buddy the scheister who fiddled UKIP's accounts as Treasurer, set out to lie to The Electoral Commission, when caught out ran away resigning his post in the most unprofessional manner leaving some 29 questions of probity unanswered - Andrew Smith and Mick McGough are, in flagrant disregard of UKIP rules and despite Mick McGough being a member of The NEC of UKIP they have registered a separate Political Party with The Electoral Commission.

UKIP's standards would seem to show one couldn't put so much as a cigarette paper between them and The LibLabCon in matters of ethics and morality - lies, deceit, duplicuity, betrayal, cheating and fiddling expenses seems endemic!

Insane choices
Coalition coughs up for EU while our armed forces are cut to the bone

By: David Campbell Bannerman MEP

In that famous phrase: “You couldn’t make it up!” The moment our Coalition Government
scraps Ark Royal, the Harriers and other essential military equipment, we need them the
most. While we bomb Libya from the UK, the French send a carrier. I have called for Ark
Royal and a minimum number of Harriers to be reprieved – just as Invincible was reprieved
by the Falklands crisis (which did Mrs Thatcher no harm).

The shambolic sight of UK rescue operations in Libya was a national embarrassment.
The ridiculous choices of the Coalition Government, to spend more on EU membership
(now £48 million a day) and foreign aid (£23 million a day) when we are
making dangerous cuts to our own military services speaks volumes. 

They cut at home to squander money abroad.

And we call these politicians our public servants!

Falklands
This piecemeal salami slicing of our self-government has dire consequences indeed.
Even if we did have an independent foreign policy, the Coalition’s outrageous defence
cuts leave us almost defenceless.

Why else would there have been speculation on loss of the Falklands when the cuts
were announced? How can aircraft carriers without any aircraft to carry make sense?

The idea should have been laughed out of the room.

We are in the endgame to salvage what independence we have left. This is the culmination
of years of EU planning, to subvert the nation state and supplant independence
with a federated plan for a Common European interest – the United States of Europe.

Any state that cannot make plans to defend itself, cannot call itself free.

Additionally, a nation that cannot speak for itself is not free either. The institutionalization
of the European Foreign Service, with its ambassadors pledging allegiance to
the EU and not its constituent nations, will only go to gag Britain in international
affairs. Bit by bit, independent states are being elbowed aside on the international
stage by the EU and our foreign minister Baroness Ashton, a lady who has never
been elected to anything in her life. I bet she learned a lot about international diplomacy
working for the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament!

With the proliferation of these EU embassies, who acts on behalf of British
interests now? Who do foreign governments call when they wish to deal with us: the
EU or UK ambassadors?

No wonder they are closing many British embassies.

Britain’s anti-EU movement is on the rise and our voice is being heard. We want
friendly trade and cooperation with European nations, but we want to reassert our
global presence, reclaiming our seat at the WTO, making full use of our UN Security
Council seat, establishing a Commonwealth Free Trade Area, and playing a full and
active part in NATO. 

As you can see, there is a world out there. 

So why just stick in with the overregulated EU and its falling share of world wealth? 

We’re a global trading nation whose destiny lies outside the EU.
 
MEP accuses EU of trying to
‘buy’ UK referendum results
The European Parliament recently debated new regulations that will give European political parties
the right to interfere in referendums in Britain, leading UKIP MEP Stuart Agnew to accuse
the EU of attempting to “purchase the right result, first time.”

The new regulations will allow European political groups to use their funding to support campaigns in
the UK on referenda with an EU dimension, something that parliamentary rules have specifically
forbidden until now. This means that any referendum in the UK on transfers of power to the EU or on
whether or not to leave the EU would be very seriously biased in favour of the pro-Brussels line.
As the UK Government wishes to hold referenda on future transfers of power to the EU, Mr Agnew
said: “You are frightened out of your wits that we may give you a series of wrong answers, so you
intend to remove money from our taxpayers’ to indoctrinate them into your own version of the path
of true righteousness.

“Never has the EU’s gerrymandering been so clearly displayed alongside its contempt for UK
voters.”

To view the original CLICK HERE

To view the origins of this article CLICK HERE
 
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 
 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance
&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate) .
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01291 - 62 65 62